It looks like a covert hatchet job to me. James-Osbourne: Holmes
-----Original Message----- From: gmac [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:54 AM To: Silver - List Subject: CS>Blood cells. I have reposted this from another list. Any comments?? Grant.. Another approach. Worth exploring, and inexpensive. GET SMART BEFORE USING IT THOU!!!!!! I'm not a real fan of CS, as I saw what daily use does to the Red Blood Cells (RBC) in the Naessens Ultra-Darkfield Microscope Live Blood Screening. An RN asked my to let her see her blood. We did, and the RBC's looked like they had been hacked or sliced with a razor blade. When I saw them, I was alarmed at what I had never seen before. It was obvious that something bad was going on to her RBC's. Then she told me she was and had been using a single dosage CS solution on a daily basis, for some time. She agreed that the picture was NOT GOOD!!!!! Three days later, she asked again to look at her blood -- it was improved, but still had damage to a larger percentage of RBC's. She had discontinued using the CS. Since then, I have been told by a competent Microbiologist, who specializes in the Naessens Blood analysis, that what we saw was classical Cell Wall Deficiency. Since then, it has been suggested by competent medical personnel, that taking CS is akin to Antibodics. Get on them heavy for a short period and then totally off. Makes sense to me, as I've also seen the disastrous effects of long term med's. I doubt that consciously, I will allow any antiboditics for me for longer then 7- 10 days. If the job isn't done by then, there is probably very little chance of ever doing the job, and the long term NEGATIVE side effects of antiboditics can be disastrous. NOW, having said that, REALLY GET YOUR Doctor to LEVEL with you ON ALL THE BAD POINTS OF THE ANTIBODITICS they are loading you with. They OWE you that much ----- Remember, they are only consultants to you, NOT a Dictator to you. Also remember, the dianogistic accuracy for things like LYMES, CFS, FIBERMIALGICA, etc., are probably less than 10 % accurate --- that means one out of ten chances of correct diagnosis. That is not just pretty bad, that is totally unsatisfactory. What would your doctor do if his or her car only stared one out of ten times they turned the ignition key. OR their telephone only functioned one out of ten times!!!! NOTE, it is stated, that The Mayo Brothers, at the height of their proficiency, with all their cases, only approached 50 % correct diagnosis, back in the late 30's. There are much data and writings that back up the above. Just interview the many ladies who have been down the route. I'll be sending some of the info on studies of reports on the Doctor caused ( Iatrogenic ) deaths in the USA. A recent article stated, that one in four beds in the UK are occupied by patients harmed by their medical personnel system. Western Medicine is in a death spiral -- Wait until the data is released on the exodus of qualified Nurses, and the replacement with 10 day wonders, called nurses aides. The stories I'm aware of from nurses and Md's in the states, has convinced me that if I need a hospital, I'll pay my own and go to Old Mexico --- I've toured two facilities down there,and that is my choice. I really dislike finding out about these problems, but, I fell it is only just to tell it like I see it. Don't take my opinion, check it out yourself. Have fun, be healthy and happy, ed. PS Have you purchased Dan Haley's Book " POLITICS IN HEALING " yet??????? -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
