Thanks! I've read the "What If Everything . . ." book and checked out her site, which has some good documentation. I'll check out the rest. The controversy is a good thing, the dogmatism of the medical establishment is appalling; one programmer on the local radio station produced a series on alternative viewpoints and was slammed, character assassinated, and almost kicked off the station by the kindly do-good AIDS help and support cohort; fascinating and disturbing. All she did was interview some of the more prominent and responsible dissenting scientists, allowing them to present their evidence.
Marshall Dudley wrote: > Benzene: http://www.health-truth.com/articles/hiv02.asp > http://www.aidsinfobbs.org/articles/quilty/q05/2163 > http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/sblubejob.htm > > http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/324/7331/237#19114 > http://www.healtoronto.com/ifnothiv.html > http://www.sumeria.net/aids/whatif.html > http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/ > > AZT: http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/cffiction.htm > > malnutrition in Africa is major cause there: > http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/324/7335/446/a#20389 > http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/324/7337/564#20541 > > Marshall > > Malcolm Stebbins wrote: > > > Marshall Dudley wrote: > > > > > [email protected] wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Marshall, > > >> > > >> > > >> > . As I am sure you know from all the discussions we have had here > > >> > previously > > >> > oral CS is usless for upper respiratory, since there is no way for it > > >> > to > > >> > reach the infected mucus via that route. > > >> > > >> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> I have to beg your pardon a bit ! Do you know how many times I have read > > >> how > > >> great CS is > > > > > >> snippety - snip > > > > > This is interesting! I could understand that PCR techniques might give a > > statistically invalid picture of the presence of various scraps of protein, > > thus > > suggesting HIV when it is not present, but to go from that to the > > conclusion that > > HIV is therefor present is quite a jump. Is there more info on this > > statement > > that everyone already has HIV in their system - that it "is everywhere"?? > > Regarding your claim that HIV will not affect a person with a healthy immune > > system . . . many if not most of the victims of AIDS started off with > > healthy > > immune systems, and when they found they were infected with HIV put much > > time and > > energy into health and immune strengthening protocols; were they all just > > weaklings, immunologically speaking? > > > > >> > > > > > > How can you get much less innocuous than HIV? It is impossible to get an > > > elevated HIV count without the immune system being completely destroyed. > > > If you > > > take an HIV test without diluting the blood 100:1, you will find everyone > > > has > > > some HIV in the blood, it is everywhere. It will not affect a healthy > > > person at > > > all. The tough ones are things like lyme. > > > > > > Marshall > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
