I would like to make a clarifying statement
relative to our experiences with DMSO and CS in urinary tract pathogenic
insults. We did, in fact, conduct some experimental research addressing
urinary tract/bladder-specific pathogenic presentations. Among the
protocols invoked were varying concentrations of DMSO X CS. Without
laborious explanation I offer the following general comment on our
experiences in these evaluations.
We found, in general, 90% CS (as the parent solution) mixed
with 10% (by volume) of full-strength DMSO, to be quite efficacious in
controlling a number of, previously, non-responsive pathogenic
presentations in the bladder and lower urinary tract of both female and
male research volunteers. I will not elaborate on the details of the
exact protocol other than to state that quite simple methodologies were
utilized to introduce....via catheterizing instrumentation----these
solutions directly into the bladder and adjacent urethral environments.
A majority (approximately 85%) of the volunteers enjoyed a rapid and
complete, favorable, resolution of their various pathogenic insults.
Notable among the results was the speed (sometimes within 24 hours) of
the favorable response and the exponential reduction in pathogen
populations.
We have engaged in rather extensive evaluations of colloidal
silver and DMSO over the recently-passed years......experiencing, in
general, results superior over most of the more conventional alleopathic
addresses-----for both systemic in vivo and topical insults of a
pathogenic nature.
Our original investigations were prompted by an interest
in the work of Dr. Stanley Jacob and his associates. If any are
interested, you may find the following url of interest.
Http://www.jacoblab.com/Studies.htm Most especially the reference to
the investigation of DMSO use in interstitial insults. We found that
the addition of colloidal silver increased effectivities by an order of
magnitude.
I do not wish to become engaged in adversarial
confrontation with ANY of the list membership....all may make of these
comments what they desire. However, they are given with an attitude of
assistance only----designed toward assistng those who would willingly
accept the responsibility for educating themselves in maintaining their
personal health in the
"presently-extant" socio-economic environment.
Do remember that our research experiences are "experimental
only" and do not reflect or imply any form of medical treatment, cure or
prescription......for ANY medical condition.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
p.s. Although I do not often do so, I have an admonition issued in the
distant past.....which seems appropriate in the face of some of the more
strident comment now manifesting on the list-------- "Fanatic.....One
who redoubles his effort...after having lost sight of his goal."
"James Osbourne, Holmes" wrote:
> Yes, that is to what I was referring: upper Respiratory tract
> infections. Sorry for the too-cryptic abbreviation. James-Osbourne:
> Holmes
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:22 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: CS>Re: CS and protozoa
>
> "James Osbourne, Holmes" wrote:
>
> > "since there is no way for it to reach the infected mucus
> > via that route."The work of Brooks Bradley's group shows
> > that DMSO does enable CS to reach pathogens in UR
> > infections.
>
>
> I don't think Brooks ever mentioned treating UR infections
> with oral CS. Everything I recall reading was using it with
> DMSO and nebulizing it wasn't it?
>
> Marshall
>
