Jason: There are the plain issues in conflict here. Stan does look like that or he doesn't; the photo was doctored or it wasn't.
There are very many threads out there in cyber world stating as fact that the candidate is blue. I would like to give an accurate rebuttal to those threads if possible. Package it or label it any way you wish, but that's all I hope to do. Laura In a message dated 10/18/02 12:07:51 AM Central Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: > Laura: > > The problem here is the same problem that often occurs... Those who feel > threatened begin by striking back; they enter attack mode. This in turn > sets a tide in motion that results in end confusion. > > Stan Jones has Argyria. If there are differences in the photographic > display of the images, there could be several reasons, most of them likely > non-intentional, including what color profile was used to digitally render > the images. > > It's just like the incorrect story that STILL floats around about > Rosemary... Stating that some diabolical scheme was put into place, > including the rendering of images... When the truth is: The Argyria > condition was severely aggrevated when some uneducated doctor decided that > perhaps dermabrasion would cure the condition... Dermabrasion being similiar > to taking sand paper and removing layers of the skin. > > The diabolical story is repeated here, as it is on the news: people like > sensationalism, people like power, and people like attention. > > Nothing gets one's attention like a good conspiracy theory... However, the > truth is, again, that the real conspiracies are seamless, well-thought out, > and unbreachable. The amauteurish stuff? Fear not the truth... The truth > catches up with those who enjoy the games for the sake of ego. Let these > types of people be handled by those who are trained to do so. Those who are > trained to do so know how to go about doing it without destroying everything > along the way. > > Fighting ignorance with ignorance is ill-advised. > > Just like one doesn't have to be afraid of the truth, one doesn't have to be > afraid of the lies... When one studies truth for long enough, not only does > one discover how much one doesn't -- and cannot! -- know, but one discovers > how impotent the lies truly are. The power of lies is executed through > those who believe them, not the lies themselves. People are conditioned to > accept lies. Don't fight the lies, fight the conditioning. > > There is either a desire to know the truth, a desire to believe the lies, or > a lack of caring... > > Beating confusion means accepting when one walks in the unknown. This means > relinquishing a bit of control. Those who need to be in control also have a > need to be controlled. The fear becomes too great, the power too demanding. > The unknown elements become paralysing. Thus is the unwise ruler ruled. > > Confusion is paralysing. This is the one principle one really needs to > grasp to understand how large populations are nuetralized. Whether or not > there are those shouting the truth from roof-tops is irrelevant. If there > is enough confusion generated, the confusion will prevent action. > > To overcome confusion where the truth is displayed in blinding clarity? > Screaming louder doesn't work. Another scientific study... doesn't work. > > Attraction works. > > Where you really want to focus your attention is reaching those who have the > desire for the truth... You can't be doing two things at one time. Someone > who is seeking the truth will not be attracted to the ensuing fight of the > idea sellers -- those trying to convince those who could care less,or those > who want to believe the lies because they are too afraid to accept some > personal responsiblity. > > The truth is often lost in the conflict. > > There are those who would like to state that we know the absolute truth > about Argyria. We have mounting evidence, but we do not have the absolute > truth. What we do have is threshold levels that have been scientifically > established with relative certainty. Whether or not "isolated" > electro-colloidal silver exceeds this "maximum intake", like many of us > suspect, and how much it can exceed the threshold levels, has not been > established. > > To claim that is has been established is an insult to the very thing that > some are trying to stand for: The truth. > > This claim sets to stone confusion. The interested party becomes confused, > because they are trying to believe propaganda. It is very hard to make a > distinction between two equally shared lies. > > It's the same thing with hydrogen peroxide. Those seeking the truth will > find it. The journey in finding the truth will teach them how to safely use > it. In the end, there will be no fear, nor confusion. The iteration is the > same: The desire drives the interest -- the caring -- the caring becomes > more important than having to be in control -- in having to know the > absolute truth right now yea but. > > The one secret is in the power of attraction backed by an authentic ( and > rare ) honesty. > > My thanks to Bill for opening up a senseable conversation with the > journalist. > > Jason > ( Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ) > > -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
