Laura: Sorry! My post was a general useless ramble...
I answer quite a few emails on a daily basis; when I write my emails, I sit down start typing and press the send key. If I didn't, I wouldn't have nearly enough time to respond on a daily basis. All of this wasn't directed at you personally. Different images are going to look very different with Argyria, especially if a digital camera was used. In order to determine if an image is doctored, you would need the original media to do a comparison with any variations that exist. A talented eye would need to look at the modified media with a fine magnifying glass. Media-doctored images are best done with airbrushes. A pixle by pixle comparison on digital images would shed some light on any modifications that were rendered digitally. If one is really as interested as claimed, then the simple solution is to go see him. I'm personally impressed with his attitude, I bet he's a great guy. The conflict was created; it did not exist before it was created. The plain issue is that it's natural for people to throw out opinions based on little more than passion. You've now read personal accounts of witnesses that notice the difference; you've now read the statement that the candidate says he has a skin pigmentation problem. On whose authority will you rest your belief on? Personal investigation is the best authority. I don't have that great of interest, because it doesn't surprise me that the gentleman contracted Argyria. You ought to try brewing what he brewed. In fact, maybe I will do that this weekend, and take a picture so that folks can see what the man was drinking. I'd even do it with distilled water and a touch of salt rather than tap water, as the mineral content of this tap water would be quite different than his. He would likely have been ok for another few years if he hadn't run the batch for an hour. Kind Regards, Jason ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 8:14 AM Subject: Re: CS>Re: Tom Kotynski - Thanks Bill - confused > Jason: > > There are the plain issues in conflict here. Stan does look like that or > he doesn't; the photo was doctored or it wasn't. > > There are very many threads out there in cyber world stating as fact that > the candidate is blue. I would like to give an accurate rebuttal to those > threads if possible. > > Package it or label it any way you wish, but that's all I hope to do. > > Laura > > > > In a message dated 10/18/02 12:07:51 AM Central Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > > Laura: > > > > The problem here is the same problem that often occurs... Those who feel > > threatened begin by striking back; they enter attack mode. This in turn > > sets a tide in motion that results in end confusion. > > > > Stan Jones has Argyria. If there are differences in the photographic > > display of the images, there could be several reasons, most of them likely > > non-intentional, including what color profile was used to digitally render > > the images. > > > > It's just like the incorrect story that STILL floats around about > > Rosemary... Stating that some diabolical scheme was put into place, > > including the rendering of images... When the truth is: The Argyria > > condition was severely aggrevated when some uneducated doctor decided that > > perhaps dermabrasion would cure the condition... Dermabrasion being > similiar > > to taking sand paper and removing layers of the skin. > > > > The diabolical story is repeated here, as it is on the news: people like > > sensationalism, people like power, and people like attention. > > > > Nothing gets one's attention like a good conspiracy theory... However, the > > truth is, again, that the real conspiracies are seamless, well-thought out, > > and unbreachable. The amauteurish stuff? Fear not the truth... The truth > > catches up with those who enjoy the games for the sake of ego. Let these > > types of people be handled by those who are trained to do so. Those who > are > > trained to do so know how to go about doing it without destroying > everything > > along the way. > > > > Fighting ignorance with ignorance is ill-advised. > > > > Just like one doesn't have to be afraid of the truth, one doesn't have to > be > > afraid of the lies... When one studies truth for long enough, not only > does > > one discover how much one doesn't -- and cannot! -- know, but one discovers > > how impotent the lies truly are. The power of lies is executed through > > those who believe them, not the lies themselves. People are conditioned to > > accept lies. Don't fight the lies, fight the conditioning. > > > > There is either a desire to know the truth, a desire to believe the lies, > or > > a lack of caring... > > > > Beating confusion means accepting when one walks in the unknown. This > means > > relinquishing a bit of control. Those who need to be in control also have > a > > need to be controlled. The fear becomes too great, the power too > demanding. > > The unknown elements become paralysing. Thus is the unwise ruler ruled. > > > > Confusion is paralysing. This is the one principle one really needs to > > grasp to understand how large populations are nuetralized. Whether or not > > there are those shouting the truth from roof-tops is irrelevant. If there > > is enough confusion generated, the confusion will prevent action. > > > > To overcome confusion where the truth is displayed in blinding clarity? > > Screaming louder doesn't work. Another scientific study... doesn't work. > > > > Attraction works. > > > > Where you really want to focus your attention is reaching those who have > the > > desire for the truth... You can't be doing two things at one time. > Someone > > who is seeking the truth will not be attracted to the ensuing fight of the > > idea sellers -- those trying to convince those who could care less,or those > > who want to believe the lies because they are too afraid to accept some > > personal responsiblity. > > > > The truth is often lost in the conflict. > > > > There are those who would like to state that we know the absolute truth > > about Argyria. We have mounting evidence, but we do not have the absolute > > truth. What we do have is threshold levels that have been scientifically > > established with relative certainty. Whether or not "isolated" > > electro-colloidal silver exceeds this "maximum intake", like many of us > > suspect, and how much it can exceed the threshold levels, has not been > > established. > > > > To claim that is has been established is an insult to the very thing that > > some are trying to stand for: The truth. > > > > This claim sets to stone confusion. The interested party becomes confused, > > because they are trying to believe propaganda. It is very hard to make a > > distinction between two equally shared lies. > > > > It's the same thing with hydrogen peroxide. Those seeking the truth will > > find it. The journey in finding the truth will teach them how to safely > use > > it. In the end, there will be no fear, nor confusion. The iteration is > the > > same: The desire drives the interest -- the caring -- the caring becomes > > more important than having to be in control -- in having to know the > > absolute truth right now yea but. > > > > The one secret is in the power of attraction backed by an authentic ( and > > rare ) honesty. > > > > My thanks to Bill for opening up a senseable conversation with the > > journalist. > > > > Jason > > ( Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ) > > > > > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
