Hi Jack, On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:54:57 -0700, Jack Dayton <[email protected]> wrote:
>Trem wrote in-part: > >> In one sample of 10 ppm colloidal silver we sent out for total analysis >> (made with 99.9% silver electrodes), the primary impurities found were: 1) >> Sodium, 470 ppb, 2) Calcium, 260 ppb, 3) Manganese, 70 ppb, 4) Potassium, 50 >> ppb, and 5) Magnesium, 24 ppb. Since none of these impurities could have >> come from the silver, it suggests that the purity of the water should be of >> greater concern to the person making their own colloidal silver, than >> spending extra money on purer silver." >****************************** >Hi Trem, >If the culprit is the DW, where can "PURE" DW be found? >I'm sure that labratory grade DW is available, I wouldn't >know where to buy it, even if a producer would sell >small amounts. The "impurities" in Trem's test batch (if it was Trem's) are common minerals you get daily in quantities that are thousands to millions of times bigger. Many people even take supplements to increase the amount of most of these "impurities." :) (I take Calcium, Magnesium and Manganese supplements daily.) IOW, it's not something to worry about. (BTW, most .999 fine silver is actually closer to .9999 fine, but since people are mostly looking for .999 fine silver, that's how it's marked. Go to a coin shop and look at their .999 fine silver rounds. Many are marked .999+ (plus sign) fine silver.) -- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
