http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m59121.html
> Re: CS> Finally, a use for all that old silver you have lying around
> From: Robert Berger
> Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 14:44:24
> Mike,
> Come on now, how can you say a subject test is better that a
> definitive one!!!!
> Just give me some numbers from a "salt test" You could at least
> set up photometeric test and compare the density with know ppm
> !!!!!
> I wouldhave expected something better from someone who uses HP ans
> Kiethley test gear.
> "Ole Bob"
I'm thinking of the people in the field who are using cs for the
first time, and need some way to test the quality. It is impractical
to send samples to a qualified lab from the Congo or Moldavia.
These people are much more skilled at subjective tests than we are.
Their life may depend on knowing the quality of the food they
process. They develop very fine judgement on the things they ingest.
While it certainly is possible to set up a photometric test to
compare the density of the dispersion. I really don't think it is
necessary. Here's why.
I had a mild case of shingles a while ago, and posted the results of
using cs to a web page. Warning, some of the pictures on this link
are very graphic:
http://www.geocities.com/mrmonett/shingles/0shin.htm
Unfortunately, Yahoo bought Geocities and my password dosn't work
anymore, so I cannot update that page.
The cs quickly killed the virus, which was the first proof I had
that cs works on viruses as well as bacteria. However, I also had a
severe exposure to mold, which severely degraded my immune system.
So the shingle persisted as a low-level infection. This produced
constant sores that never healed.
I was drinking 8 oz of cs daily. This was enough to kill the
friendly bacteria, and my digestion was always poor.
After you pointed out it was possible to make clear cs with high
strength, I started using your hints and reduced the current
density. I started working on this on Thursday, May 8. I posted the
first results on Friday, May 9.
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m58814.html
All the stuff I made that weekend was junk and I discarded it. But
Monday I finally figure out what was going on, and produced my first
true high-quality, clear cs.
The salt test showed a very strong dispersion compared to my
previous stuff. None of the batches have changed in any way since
they were made, whereas my previous stuff only lasted several days.
On the following Wednesday, the shingles scabs fell off and have not
returned.
My cs guinea pig and I both noticed we were using much less cs to
stop the pain from our cavities. Instead of taking one mouthfull
each day, we were going three or four days with no cs.
So clear cs made with very low current density works better than
high current density. The difference in the salt test is very
pronounced, and there is no mistaking which is which.
Since much less black crud is formed with the low current density
process, there is a stronger correlation between the total number of
Coulombs transferred and the concentration of silver ions. The
process has become more predictable.
Since the current is semi-controlled with the series resistor, it is
only necessary to monitor the time to get consistent results.
Not many bush natives wear Rolex watches, but they can judge the
time by watching the stars at night, or by shadow angles during the
day. The process is slow enough that fifteen minutes error will make
little difference.
However, they still have no way to tell if the water contains ions
except by adding salt. This is expensive in some locations.
Pushing the low density process is possible, and it produces a very
pale straw color. By very pale, I mean you cannot detect it by
holding the glass up to the light. You have to look straight down
the glass so you are looking through a longer path through the
water.
This produces an even stronger dispersion in the salt test. There is
no way to confuse which process produce which dispersion. The
dispersions are very distinct from each other.
I realize the pale straw color is an indication of larger particles
- these are what produce the color. But it is also an indication of
the concentration of ions. These are what made the particles.
I am fairly convinced the ions are responsible for the biological
activity. I made plenty of particles with my previous process, and
they plated out on the side of the glass and produced black crud on
the electrodes. But the shingles didn't disappear until I was able
to make cs that gave a much stronger dispersion in the salt test -
which is a direct indication of the concentration of ions.
Since the stronger concentration had such good effect, and reduced
the consumption of cs, it seems to be the way to go.
Since the pale straw cs has an even higher concentration of ions,
and has a built-in indicator to tell the concentration, this seems
to be the way to go.
And if the process is good enough for a bush native, it's good
enough for me:)
Thanks, Robert.
Best Regards,
Mike Monett
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
