One important point: if we say that Nassens was "literally" crucified, this means that he was put up on a cross and killed. He was not. He was metaphorically or figuratively crucified, perhaps, but not literally.
By writing this I do not want to be pedantic, but rather want to help us avoid the kind of error that weakens our arguments. I am interested to learn more about this Canadian scientist, and appreciate the posting below, and am glad that the good scientist was NOT literally crucified! [email protected] wrote: > > Hello to All :) > > Although Gaston Nassens was crucified in the U.S. His compound 714x > was legally approved, because of those who came forward in court with > medical records showing the use of the substance and the improvement of > their condition after they were told they were terminal ((((financially > written off, and assigned to the grave...))) > by the standard U.S. / Canadian medical establishment... Are many of us here > not establishing the same situation ? See: http://www.cerbe.com/... > Although Nassens was literally crucified by > corrupt FDA agent working for the Chemical Pharmaceutical Industry, and > B.A.T.F. militia bearing > swat gear and AR-15s in the U.S., He had an outright victory in court > against the corporate greed that represents only 1-5% of the world's > population... Can we not rise to this occasion, and > take back our rights guaranteed us in the U.S. Constitution, from these > inbred cretins, that would-be corporate gods. On top of this we should begin > to identify this upper 1-5% by name, photographic picture, and all known > addresses. This should be permanently displayed via Internet / if necessary > through the national library chain of networks... At first one might think > this is an overwhelming task, but not if taken in small steps... These > people are mortal too, and they must pull on there pants every day, one leg > at a time, just like us... They have also clearly sold their souls and > hearts for $$$... That simple machiavellian fact marks them permanently, so > that they are usually incapable of performing truly selfless acts... This > will be the formula we can use for their defeat, and for the > re-establishment of true scientific progress in medical care. > Robert C. Beck, D.Sc. followed this principle, and developed a valid > electro-medical protocol, that despite plea's and ultimately threats from > the corporate elite, now yields us a proven (decade-tested) protocol. One > that just happens to include the crucial use of C.S. as one of it's > components... > > Regards to All, > Alexander J.Federowicz > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ode Coyote [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 7:24 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: CS>CS vs The FDA > > THe FDA uses the phrase "Not proven safe and effective" which doesn't > mean "Proven unsafe and ineffective" > But it does throw the burden of proof elsewhere..to a place from which no > proof available is acceptable to the FDA. > Mere clinical trials are not acceptable proof. They are only indications > that proof can be had...that studies are worth doing [except they can't pay > off for anyone who would finance them] > > Got a few mill to throw at officially acceptable triple blind studies of a > few thousand people? > > Ode > > At 12:24 AM 6/3/2003 -0400, you wrote: > >Ohh yea... Hypothetically even if CS did cause argyria, which I doubt, we > >shouldn't focus so much on the negatives of CS. Or maybe we could put a > >little focus on cons of CS vs the cons of synthetic meds. Between this > group > >we have much knowledge and with reputable people like "ole" Bob and Frank > >Key they would be able to sort out any BS thrown towards the lawsuit.... > >scientifically speaking. If they were to be involved. > > > >Might be nice to know I made some kinda mark during my life. I know there > is > >a lawsuit for aspartame so why not start one with CS/IES? I think this > could > >be a mile stone for this list as well as the world if we were to win. :) > >Besides we already have a pretty good idea what they will try to throw at > >us. The FDA's exibit A,B, and C will all be related argyria..... cough > cough > >bull sh#%.... we would have a good start on 'em. > >Ice > > > > > >-- > >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > >Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > > >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
