Mike, No, it's just that I'm using a dial caliper and it's really hard to get a good reading because of the corrugations. Obviously it is now thinner but since the degradation appears to be evenly distributed between all the electrodes I suspect it will be some time before I can see any significant measurable change.
Trem ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Monett" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:03 PM Subject: Re: CS>$$$ perpectives > url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60147.html > Re: CS>$$$ perpectives > From: Trem > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:30:35 > > > I test each SG7 individually by running a 1 1/2 gallon batch to > > assure the unit works properly before shipment. > > > I also produce a batch every day or so to use around our household > > and also produce and give away as much as possible locally to > > those needing it. > > > I conservatively estimate at least 500 gallons have been made > > using the test electrode which still looks original as far as > > shape is concerned. > > > That is the edges of the electrodes (4) are not thin and sharp as > > you keep stating will be the fact. They started out at .013 inches > > and they are still that thickness as best I can measure. > > Trem, > > Something is wrong. If the electrodes started out at 0.013 inches, > and you processed 500 gallons and they are still 0.013 inch, how > much silver was deposited in the dw? > > Am I misunderstanding what you are saying? > > Best Regards, > > Mike Monett > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > >
