"Smith, Michael" wrote: > Well first of all there is the sheer volume of water. I personally do not > want to spend all day drinking litres and litres of water and then having to > run to the toilet to pee 37 times a day! > > Secondly - Ronald J. Gibbs studied the efficacy of colloidal silver against > bacteria,(which is of relevance to my current infection) and concluded that > a minimum of 9 parts colloidal silver to 1 part bacteria-laden water is > required for colloidal silver to be effective in reducing the bacteria > colony count to one. He further concluded that a 20:1 ratio provided optimum > efficacy. Any concentration less than 9 parts CS to 1 part bacteria-laden > water and the bacteria colony would not be killed off totally and would then > start to multiply again. So what I conclude from this in my current > situation is that my 2 litres a day of 10ppm CS for the last two + weeks > which has done nothing but keep the infection where it is is not enough to > totally destroy the infection. So the way I see it is that I can drink CS > with a higher ppm (of course the best quality, smallest particles, > completely clear) OR I can drink more volume of the same CS. > I would rather drink CS with a higher ppm at the same volume because:
That is odd. The tests I am aware of indicated that CS in the range of 3 to 5 ppm was most effective, and that once you get to 10 or above the effectiveness drops off rather significantly as the ppm and particle size increases. Marshall -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
