Hello Al, I don't understand Bearden's theories at all.
I am trying to learn. I have looked at the schematics of the MMG, and read some of the descriptions of how the thing works, but my understanding is limited. Do you only talk with Mensa members? JOH -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 12:24 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>Re: About a extraordinary experiment Please list the one's for me that you understand first, and detail for me why it is that you understand each of them to be valid... Then We can proceed with the discussion, relative to your level of understanding JOH... That is..., JOH, Besides the fact that they have been conceived of, constructed, and are presently tangible & repeatable proofs of theory. With Patience, Al ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 11:50 PM Subject: RE: CS>Re: About a extraordinary experiment > Hello A.F., > > Which of Bearden's experiments are you going to do? > > Thanks in advance, > > JOH > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: CS>Re: About a extraordinary experiment > > > Hi Mike :) > > Please go look up Dr. Thomas Bearden on the web. There may well be > some factors your overlooking with classic entropy-based theory. In > two days Iwill have duplicated this experiment pretty closely... I'll > post the results. > > Regards, > A.F. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Monett" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 8:26 PM > Subject: CS>Re: About a extraordinary experiment > > > > url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m63365.html > > CS>Re: About a extraordinary experiment > > From: Peter Rebaudo > > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:59:26 > > > > > Hi: > > > > > Get a hold of this tale ! > > > > > The positive silver electrode is introduced into a DW container, > > > 300cc, the other is outside the glass container. > > > > > DW measures 1.0 u Siemens > > > Voltage= 34V > > > Supply: Sota constant current set a 1mA. > > > After 2 days, 2.4uS > > > After 5 days, 14.0 uS and a heaviest, by far, Tyndall I have ever > > > seen. > > > The final product have zero taste. > > > The electrodes have no darkening or coating what so ever. > > > There was no sediments. > > > The container was glass 2" in diameter by 7.5" high > > > Electrodes 12 Ga, 5.5" summerged. > > > The voltage stay constant at 34V, there was no measurable > > current. > > > > > I am looking forward to comments. > > > > > Regards > > > > > Peter R > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > You have requested comments, but have not responded to any. > > > > You are technically literate. You have posted accurate data on > > led's. You have downloaded Mercury - you posted a link to Roger's > > web page where people could download Eureka, the predecessor of > > Mercury. Roger wrote both programs. > > > > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m61728.html > > > > A quick check in Mercury shows the current required to liberate 14 > > ppm of silver in 300 ml of dw in 5 days is 14.77 uA. > > > > Here's the data: > > > > days = 5 > > hrs = 24 * days > > ml = 300 ; volume of dw > > mnt = 0 ; minutes > > ppm = 14 > > > > Here's the result: > > > > Cou = 6.381685 > > I = 1.477241E-05 > > sec = 432000.0 > > gm = 0.004200 > > k = 0.000658 > > lt = 0.300000 > > ml = 300.0000 > > mg = 4.200000 > > phr = 0.116666 > > ppm = 14.00000 > > hrs = 120.0000 > > > > Most dvms can easily measure 14 uA. You state the current was zero, > > as expected. You know how to measure currents this low. So there was > > no electrolysis. Even leakage currents would not suffice to explain > > your data. Glass is a very good insulator, and would not support a > > current of 14 uA. > > > > You know the conductivity of air is zero for all practical purposes. > > You also know placing the cathode outside the glass means no current > > can flow, and there can be no electrolysis. > > > > With no electrolysis, there can be no liberation of silver at the > > anode. > > > > Silver is insoluble in water. If you doubt this, please see a paper > > on Frank's web site that discusses the solubility of silver in > > distilled water. The statement is the first sentence in the second > > paragraph: > > > > http://www.silver-colloids.com/Papers/Solubility_Products.PDF > > > > Yet your measurement implies the equivalent of 4.2 milligrams of > > silver was released. This cannot be true. Silver is insoluble. > > > > If it were contamination, it would be released at the start of the > > experiment. The conductivity would increase rapidly, then remain > > constant. It would not show a steady increase over 5 days. So it's > > not contamination. > > > > You have not done a salt test to see if silver ions are present. You > > know it will prove there are none. > > > > So this is a hoax, right? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Mike Monett > > > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal > > silver. > > > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: > > http://silverlist.org > > > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > > > Silver-list archive: > > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > > > >
