Marshall,
Thanks for keeping up with this thread, even after I've slackened off on
it.  I am continuing work with this generator, optimistic it can be made
to work well.  But I'm now doing this parallel with some other promising
possibilities, with unexpected forms of silver.  So there will be a
little more time involved with the electrolytic silver.  I'm thinking
that the 'other stuff' in the honey may have caused the reaction to go
out of control, so a first move will be to go back to undertaking the
process without a starter.  Then, according to how that goes, I'll
selectively use some kind of starter, by incremental amount.  From
previous work, and local lab results, we have verified that the ppm of
this kind of electrolysis CS is over 250, which is just on the edge of
viability.  But at this point it's all a question of which form of
silver is most cost effective.

I'm sorry to say that the approach that a lot of people are taking to
getting water to the poor is very insular, with little information
sharing.  So a bunch of groups, who claim to have only the interests of
the poor at heart, all seem to be off on their own tangents, each
looking for the biggest piece of the pie.  The pie is with the policy
makers in water health, who now have a newly perceived notion that
silver ceramics is a big possibility for getting water to the poor.  So
it's practically a given that choices will be made very soon, as to the
silver ceramic systems with which to go forward.  Unfortunately the
atmosphere itself, of a lack of information sharing, does as much damage
as anything.  So why should anyone continue sharing?

As is the case with so much of the policy of various governments these
days, unfortunately the systems of silver ceramics are viewed strictly
as a market place for business, which of course, includes non-profit
organizations, posturing for programatic funding.  The big, unasked
question is:  why is this not viewed as 'a war,' like so many others?
After all, in poor countries thousands are dying daily due to bacteria
contaminated water.  I guess that the answer is that in the war against
the harmful bacteria there's nobody like an enemy person that's doing
any of the fighting, merely bacteria.  But now that we have answers
aren't we more obliged than ever to take a team approach?  Fortunately
the silver-listees do cooperate in this spirit, and we can look forward
to further sharing.  At least it is true that in the silver aspect of
silver ceramics we can look to others for helpful observations.

Oh well, I too have been tangential.
Thanks to all,
Reid

Marshall Dudley said:
Sugar and honey are not the same thing. Honey contains lots of things
besides
sugar and water, many of which will ionize in water.





--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>