Hi Trem, You´re right, I just was arranging all the information about the PWT, so the conductance measurements and units arised in my mind to be mentioned properly. So I did it. I just noted that the "PWT" instead "microSiemens" has been frequently used as if it is the same. Pavel H.
> Hi Pavel, > > I forgot to mention the UPW meter only measures to 1.999 uS which is not > adequate for measuring all distilled water since much of the available water > is above 2.0 uS. And of course it wouldn't be able to measure CS at all. > Not a good choice. It's for measuring the highest grade water such as that > used in circuit board cleaning, etc. > > Trem > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pavel Hochmut" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 2:30 AM > Subject: [silver_list] CS>The Hanna PWT meter, conductivity vs. ppm values > > > > If you look on the Hanna pages more carefuly, you can also find the > HI98309 > > "UPW" meter (the UPW means Ultra Pure Water tester) with the range 1,000 - > > 0,020 microSiemens with the resolution of 0,001 microsiemens. > > So: who has the HI 98309 UPW model, he can measure the conductivity more > > precisely having dvo decimal places more than with the PWT model. But the > > UPW model is approx. 3 times more expensive than the PWT one. > > So, one who says: " I have measured my DW and it has 2,9 PWT tells it > wrong. > > Correctly should be said: 2,9 microSiemens (...measured with Hanna PWT > > meter). > > > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > > > > Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > > > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > > Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] > > OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > > >
