I would avoid MSP (mild silver protein) for several reasons. 1. They can mold and grow other microorganisms 2. The effectiveness is much lower than EIS at any concentration (I estimate it is about 1 to 5% as effective. 3. Due to the decrease in effectiveness it will typically be made 100 times as strong, give you a silver load 100 times as great. 4. It has been implicated in argyria 5. It is very expensive
Marshall bob smith wrote: > Jason, Thank you for the detailed explanation. Believe me, the > time and effort (for no compensation) that you and the others on this > list who are highly qualified spend in tutoring those of us who are > uneducated in this area, is deeply appreciated. While on the > subject, I had understood from some dialogue a while back that only a > silver solution that needed something like gelatin to hold it in > suspension was a colloidal silver. This was not supposed to be good > as the gelatin could ferment even in combination with the silver > because it kept the silver particles/ions from coming in contact with > all of the vehicle used. If I remember correctly there is a product > called MSP that uses this formula. Should products formulated in this > way be avoided? Bob Smith > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jason Eaton > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:20 AM > Subject: Re: CS>EIS > Hi Bob: I coined the term Electrically Isolated Silver > several years ago. There were quite a few reasons for doing > so. We received ( and still do ) quite a bit of > correspondence from people very new to the CS world who > quickly become very confused about the different products > available under the name "colloidal silver", "ionic silver", > even "atomic" or "monoatomic" silver. We wanted to make an > accurate distinction between silver compounds and true > isolated silver products. Technically, Electrically Ionized > Silver is not accurate. >
