Re: CS>What About the Hulda Clark Frequency Issue?
From: Robb Allen
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:38:22
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m72512.html
> Hi. I completely agree with you. the syncrometer is the most
> useless electronic tool that I have ever tested. It absolutely
> does NOT work and even what makes it even worse is that her very
> loyal followers refuse to be told of its failures even though they
> themselves can't get it to work either. Then you hear the
> ridiculous argument that "only very adept people can use it". this
> also makes it worthless. I think she has done more to hurt
> alternative treatments than the fda.
> Please don't use quackwatch articles as proof. there is enough
> other proof of her fraudulent claims without using the idiot that
> owns quackwatch
> Robb
Hi Robb,
Yes, I normally try to avoid quackwatch but ran out of time. These
articles seemed well-written, made very good points, and seemed to
be free of the deliberate obfuscation found in the CS articles.
And thanks for your description of the poor reliability of the
syncrometer. From the schematic, it appeared to be one of the worst
oscillators I've ever seen. The frequency would drift as the
transistor warmed up and the battery voltage changed. This would
require changing the pressure on the plate to get the frequency back
where it was. There is no way to make an accurate test with such a
poor circuit. Here's the url again if anyone is interested:
http://www.royalrife.com/syncrometer.pdf
Best Wishes,
Mike Monett
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
