Too bad, it would be nice to have a way to clarify a subject without
breaking a thread.
So I guess I will go back to not changing headers. I find that often
even if the subject header becomes or starts inaccurate, there is still
some content applying to the original post, so an archive search of a
keyword in the body of the message(s) will bring the whole thread, and
that is probably a good thing.
sol
P.S. Mike you are a flatterer, you are!
Mike Monett wrote:
Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? NOW Changing Thread
> So the trick is to put the changed subject AFTER the original, but
> NOT before it as in :
> Now Changing Thread, was Re:CS>Is it really this quiet?
> sol
No, sol, this does not work, as you can easily see by checking the
archives. The previous thread broke as soon as j rigby changed the
subject. Unfortunately, he did not check his post, and did not know
his suggestion would not work:
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Any change you make to the subject line starts a new thread. There
is no connection to any previous thread whatsoever.
Of course, you can change the subject any time you want - people
tend to read the posts of their favorite authors and disregard those
who merely waste our time.
So I guess you know that I read your posts:)
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
