CS>H2O2 and CS
From: Marshall Dudley
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:04:44
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m74747.html

  Hi Marshall,

  Good to  see  the  old mind is still ticking over:)  I  added  a few
  comments that might help clarify some of the issues.

  > Here is  a theory as to why when H2O2 is added to CS,  the tyndall
  > goes away and it seems to be very potentiated.

  The effect  of H2O2 depends on many things, such  as  oxide content,
  temperature of  the  solution,  amount of H2O2  added,  etc.  So the
  Tyndall may or may not disappear completely.

  The improvement  in  effectiveness  depends  on  how  much  oxide is
  converted to  ions.  The reports of extreme improvement  (such  as a
  factor of  1,000) are highly exaggerated. The actual  improvment may
  be on  the  order  of 10% to 20% or  so,  depending  on  the initial
  conditions.

  > H2O2 reacts  with the silver in the particles  producing  Ag2O and
  > H2O.

  The particles are already various forms of oxides and  are generated
  in the  Nernst diffusion layer next to the electrodes. Here  are the
  basic equations:

  At the anode, a silver atom gives up an electron to become an ion.

    Ag(s) - e --> Ag(+)

  At the cathode, water dissociates and hydrogen ions accept electrons
  to form hydrogen gas:

    H2O --> H(+) + OH(-)

    2H(+) + 2e --> H2(g)

  So for every silver ion, one hydroxyl ion is produced.

  The ions  diffuse  throughout  the  solution,  mainly  by convection
  currents. I  posted  two experiments earlier that show  how  to make
  these ions visible:

    CS> Making Ions Visible
    http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m61491.html

    Re: CS> Making Ions Visible
    http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m61527.html

  The significance  of  these experiments is that the  two  ion clouds
  passed through  each  other without combining  to  form  oxides. The
  reason is  the ions have to be very close to each  other  and headed
  almost directly  towards each other before they  will  combine. This
  requires a  very  high   density   of   ions  to  give  a reasonable
  probability they will combine. The only place this occurs is  in the
  Nernst Diffusion layer close to each electrode.

  When the  ion  concentration  of both species  is  high  enough, the
  silver ions  combine with the hydroxyl ions to  form  silver oxides.
  There are at least two paths:

  Path #1:

  One silver  ion  combines  with  one  hydroxyl  ion  to  form silver
  hydroxide:

    Ag(+) + OH(-) --> AgOH  (silver hydroxide)

  The silver hydroxide dissociates to form silver oxide particles:

    2AgOH --> Ag2O + H2O    (silver oxide)

  Path #2:

  Two silver ions combine with two hydroxyl ions to form silver oxide:

    2Ag(+) + 2OH(-) --> Ag2O + H2O

  This shows why high current density produces more oxide content. The
  Nernst diffusion layer is more concentrated at high current density.

  It also shows why reversing electrode polarity and using  AC instead
  of DC produces so much oxide. When the polarity reverses, the Nernst
  diffusion layer  already  has a high concentration  of  the opposite
  species, so oxide formation begins immediately.

  When you  add H2O2 to the resulting solution, some of  the  oxide is
  converted back to ions:

    Ag2O + H2O2 --> 2Ag(+) + O2 + H2O

    2AgOH + H2O2 --> 2Ag(+) + O2 + 2H2O

  This increases  the   effectiveness   since   more  silver  ions are
  available to kill bugs.

  > 2H2O2 then reacts with the Ag2O producing 2Ag and O2 and  H2O. The
  > 2Ag are monatomic but form a Cooper pair between them,

  A Cooper pair requires charged particles in a superconducting medium
  that strain   the  nearby lattice. Besides  the  fact  your previous
  analysis was incorrect, silver atoms carry no charge and thus cannot
  form a  Cooper pair. Also, this effect requires  tempoerature  at or
  below liquid nitrogen, which means the water would be  frozen solid.
  Pure frozen  dw is nonconductive, and none of the  noble  metals are
  superconductors.

  > and the  group  of   all   the   monoatomic  silver  atoms  form a
  > distributed Bose-Einstein Condensate.

  This occurs only a temperatures within a millionth of a degree or so
  from absolute zero. Not your average home environment.

  > This results in a form of superconductivity on a small scale,

  Nope.

  > which would   increase   the   catalytic   and   electron donation
  > capability of silver by a huge amount.

  Nope. Not even related. Only ions have any biological activity.

  > So what  could  be  happening is that  this  addition  of  H2O2 is
  > creating monatomic  silver,  which along with  monatomic  gold and
  > mercury are  reported  to   have  unexpected  physical  and health
  > properties.

  I'm sure  you  do not want to take mercury in any  form.  As  far as
  monoatomic silver,  from  images and analysis on  a  Kodak  site, it
  likes to form clusters of 6 atoms or more. I doubt many  people have
  the equipment needed to determine how many atoms are in a group, and
  it would be difficult to prove any benefit is obtained  without very
  comprehensive analysis.

  > See some of the work by David Hudson on monatomic gold  and silver
  > properties and benefits for more information on this.

  I did a brief google on Hudson. Sounds like more junk science to me.

  > Just an idea to consider.

  > Marshall

Best Wishes,

Mike Monett


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>