Re: CS>Re : CS>best pppm of CS to make and use
From: Ode Coyote
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:06:15
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m75043.html

  >> The oxides  do not contribute to the conductivity of the  cs, and
  >> here's how we can tell.

  >> If you  measure the cell voltage, it decreases with time  as ions
  >> enter the solution.

  >> However, as soon as the ions reach the opposite electrodes, oxide
  >> formation begins in the Nernst diffusion layer. The  cell voltage
  >> stops decreasing and flattens out. This shows all the  current is
  >> going to making oxides.

  > Except that  they could also be coating the electrodes with  a non
  > or semi  conductive surface which would also  flatted  the voltage
  > decrease curve by partaially preventing the current  from reaching
  > the opposite electrode like putting a resistor in series.

  Very true.  With constant current, any  additional  resistance would
  increase the voltage and counteract the decrease due to conductance.
  So the cell voltage would tend to plateau.

  At the  current density I run, silver atoms form  "Spanish  Moss" on
  the cathode  at  the end of the brew. Sol also mentioned  it  on her
  Silverpuppy, so it does form at higher current densities.

  Presumably, each  silver ion that makes it to the cathode  takes one
  ion out of the total conductance and prevents one hydroxyl  ion from
  being formed, so the effect on conductance is doubled.

  But electrons  do not flow in water, so the silver ion  actually has
  to touch the cathode to gain an electron. Since it is that close, it
  is likely  to be captured by van Der Walls forces and  stick  to the
  cathode, and  does  not  wander  throughout  the  solution  like the
  oxides.

  However, hydrogen  gas is still being formed at the cathode,  and is
  enclosed by  the  silver atoms. This means hydroxyl  ions  are still
  entering the solution, which should increase the conductance.

  Also, some outgoing hydroxyl ions are likely to meet incoming silver
  ions in  the Nernst diffusion layer, so some oxides are  formed near
  the cathode.  This reduces the cell conductance, and  contributes to
  the voltage plateau.

  At the same time, the anode may get coated with a thin coat of black
  silver oxide.  This  is  electrically  conductive,  but  it probably
  doesn't contribute silver ions to the solution. If it did, the black
  coating would disappear, but instead it grows thicker with  time. So
  perhaps the  coating may limit the area available to  generate ions,
  which would tend to increase the cell voltage as you point out.

  So a  lot of things are happening at the voltage plateau, but  it is
  clear oxides  are being formed that collect on the  anode  and enter
  the solution.  So  in general, we can probably  say  the  plateau is
  mostly due to oxide formation.

  I'm going  to  perform a simple experiment soon  and  shine  a laser
  pointer on the electrodes while the brew is in progress.

  Theoretically, the  Tyndall  should not exist at  the  start  of the
  brew, but  should start at the anode about the same  time  the black
  oxide becomes  visible  and the cell voltage  starts  to  plateau. I
  expect to see a slightly weaker Tyndall at the cathode due to silver
  ions forming Spanish moss.

  > Not that  what  you say doesn't happen too, but  I've  cleaned the
  > electrodes and had the voltage start dropping again after stalling
  > out many a time.

  Yes, I see the same thing. But it quickly stalls again.

  > At the low end of a voltage plot after about 30uS, it does tend to
  > flatten out  even after cleaning the electrodes while  the current
  > stay the same. Up to around 25-30 uS the drop is pretty  linear at
  > 1 ma.

  30uS? That  is rocket fuel! How do you reach that without  having it
  turn yellow  before the brew is done? I can't get much above  24 ppm
  before it starts showing a yellow tint.

  We really need to plot the voltage curve and verify it is linear.

  I just spotted a nice dvm at Radio Shack for about US$60 that  has a
  300 baud RS-232 interface. We should both get one and I  could write
  some data collection software we could share. I plan to  include the
  Faraday calculations  and  plot the  reciprocal  of  conductance and
  calculated ppm in WPlot. That should tell us a great deal about what
  is happening, and of course, generate a slew of new questions:)

  > Beyond that  point, the CS going yellow gets more and  more likely
  > as well...and,  yellow CS reacts to H2O2 very much like  it reacts
  > with the  black  oxide  on  the  electrode  and  the  black fluffy
  > deposits that copper drops onto the bottom after a piece  of shiny
  > copper wire is left there for several days.

  > In the  Canadian  study  that  James  Allison  re-found,  there is
  > mention of  copper being antagonistic to silver ions.  Could  be a
  > correlation there?

  I don't  know. But why do you mention this? Most  cs  generators are
  all silver, or should be:)

  >> But, if  the  oxides contributed to  the  conductivity,  the cell
  >> voltage would continue decreasing indefinitely.

  > I'll buy  that beyond a point over 20 uS, but also  look  at where
  > most of the oxides are..on the electrode surface...not  doing much
  > in the way of conducting electricity.

  Yes, Ken,  silver  oxide  is conductive. Look  at  the  silver oxide
  batteries keeping time in your computer or in hearing aids.

  The silver  oxide would help form hydrogen gas at  the  cathode, but
  probably doesn't  contribute  to silver ion  release  at  the anode.
  Otherwise it would shrink instead of growing thicker.

  I don't think we can say most of the oxides stick to the electrodes.
  Probably more goes into the cs.

  [...]

  > I was  referring to CS in general as the grenade  and  precise PPM
  > not mattering much so long as you get into the parking lot  of the
  > ball park. 1 to 1 is better than OK. :-)

  >> [...]

  >> What happened  to  the simple thermal stirring you  used  to use?
  >> Actually, I  tried  it as well as the  other  methods,  and found
  >> running without  stirring  worked best for me. Of  course,  I use
  >> about 1/10th  the  current  density you  do,  so  the  brew takes
  >> longer.

  > I still  use  it because it is unbreakable and you  can't  wear it
  > out, [and  looks  cool]  but also offer a  way  to  enhance it..if
  > desired. It's  not necessary to get a desired result  but  it does
  > save some time and steps to get there.

  >> That's OK - I still make much more than I can use. With 22 ppm, I
  >> only need  1 oz every three or four days, where I used to  need 8
  >> oz of 10 ppm every day, and it still didn't kill the Shingles and
  >> cold sore viruses.

  > Everyone is different and ya gotta do what works. I've never known
  > any CS to not stop a cold sore but I don't know everyone.

  Sol just had a bad cold that didn't respond to low-ppm cs.  I expect
  to see this more often as the group ages.

  > I don't know anyone with shingles going either way..except you.

  Trem had it twice. I came across his post in the archives recently.

  > Your experience may well be very useful for someone who  has tried
  > and not succeeded.

  High-ppm cs  is  definitely the way to go. It also  killed  the cold
  sores from a teenager house guest that the 10 ppm cs barely touched.

  >>> All silver  oxides  I  know  of  display  a  color  ranging from
  >>> yellow-brown to  black.  What  if there  is  no  color  yet many
  >>> particles are apparent in a TE? How could they be an oxide?

  >> Yes, despite  Marshall's   claim,   the   oxides   that  coat the
  >> electrodes are not soluble, and they do contribute to Tyndall.

  > How could they do that if they're on the electrodes?

  The oxide forms close to, but not touching the electrodes.

  Probability theory  states half will go towards the  electrode. Some
  of those may collide and stick. The rest head off into  the solution
  where they may collide with other oxides and agglomerate into bigger
  particles where they start to show Tyndall.

  So the  absense  of  Tyndall  really  doesn't  tell  much  about the
  formation of  oxides,  and   probably   the   visible  oxide  on the
  electrodes is only a fraction of the amount in solution.

  > There's more than one oxide of silver. [4, I believe]

  > Ag2O colour:  dark brown to black. solubility/water @25C:  22 mg/L
  > AgO colour:  charcoal gray powder, black  crystal solubility/water
  > @20C: decomposes in water...which means? If you see any, the water
  > is already saturated with it?????..

  I generally  brew 22 ppm cs. The oxide collects on the anode  in the
  last 1/2  hr  or so, which is about the same time  the  cell voltage
  starts to plateau.

  In my system, silver is entering the solution at a rate of  1.55 ppm
  per hour, so the final phase accounts for a total of about 0.75 ppm.
  The visible  oxide on the anode may account for half  or  less, with
  the rest wandering around in the solution as described above.

  So it is apparent the oxide that forms on the anode is far below the
  solubility figures  stated in the chemistry books, and  it  is still
  not in solution.

  You also  did  a test recently that gave  Hanna  readings  that were
  identical to  the  Faraday calculation at about 22  ppm.  This shows
  very little oxide was formed. But it would be interesting to examine
  this test in more detail, since you mentioned the baking soda caused
  a reaction starting about an hour later.

  > backing up  what you say but going a bit beyond to  say  that both
  > views are  correct depending on concentrations but  neither saying
  > anything about pure silver particles also being there in the water
  > or what actually happens when H2O2 hits those dissolved oxides and
  > why it sometimes does nothing apparent at all.

  There can be no pure silver particles in solution since electrons do
  not flow  in  water.  Once a silver atom gives  up  an  electron and
  becomes an ion, it can't get it back.

  The only  way  a silver ion can find a negative  charge  is  when it
  meets a  hydroxyl  ion and combines to form silver  oxide,  which is
  inert.

  The only  other way is for it to reach the cathode and  form Spanish
  moss, but  this only happens at low current density. At  the current
  densities used  in the 3 nines, both anode and  cathode  get covered
  with black  silver oxide. The situation is even worse  in  Jason's 4
  nines generator, since the higher voltage increases the current rise
  at the end of the brew.

  >> That really  bothers me. I got it once, but never again.  And now
  >> you and several others are getting it. Strange.

  > The "explosion of milkyness". I didn't get it at first either, but
  > I was using off the shelf batches, not very fresh batches.

  > Perhaps when  you make yours at very low current  densities  and a
  > lot of  time, whatever happens to stored batches happens  to yours
  > as it's being made...most of the time.

  I'll have to take another look and see if I can get it to appear.

  > I tried  running at 14 microamps per square inch  [if  I recollect
  > that figure right] as per your suggestion a while back and  the CS
  > was deep  yellow before I got to 20 uS. I've never seen  yellow CS
  > "explode"..just clear  up eventaully and increase TE [not  lose TE
  > as some find]

  We should check the data in the archives - I seem to recall you were
  running at  somewhat  higher current density,  maybe  140uA/sq.in. I
  don't remember  any  mention  of yellow tint, but  I  do  recall you
  mentioning the Spanish moss on the cathode.

  > I never use more than 1 drop of H2O2 per fl oz as I hate the taste
  > after that. [yuk]

  I stopped using H2O2 for the same reason. Plus, it is not  needed if
  there are no oxides.

  > I think  the solution to all this will be a matter  of  this 'and'
  > that, plus the other stuff, rather than this 'or'  that, excluding
  > the rest.

  > Too complicated  for  me  and I  can't  bring  myself  to simplify
  > something that plainly ain't simple.

  > I guess  I'll just have to go with whatever works  without knowing
  > what it  is.  [Given a mountain of ammo, I don't  really  care how
  > much shot doesn't hit the duck so long as I get dinner.]

  Yeah, but  what  if you just shot a decoy. Wouldn't  all  those wood
  slivers get stuck in your teeth?

  > If 'this' isn't working for me, I'll for sure go with 'that' which
  > does, for me. Whatever the heck it is that works for you, I'm very
  > glad you found it and it has value.

  Ken, the doctors say another SARS virus is only a matter of time. It
  is very difficult to kill, and is a serious problem for older people
  with degraded immune systems. This increases the mortality rate.

  Despite Jason's comments on using low-ppm cs, I definitely find high
  ppm ionic cs much more effective than the 5 to 10 ppm stuff from the
  typical 3  nines. It only makes sense that a stronger  cs  will have
  greater effect.

  I believe we should have the strongest possible cs available when it
  is needed, and should continue examining the process to see where we
  can make improvements. So I very much appreciate your comments!

  > Can't have too many options.

  Yes.

  >>> Ode [ken]

Best Wishes,

Mike Monett


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>