Sorry, I thought it was so obvious that I ended up not being clear... Randi operated on the premise that if he could reproduce an effect by trickery, then the person who originally produced the effect *must* have done it by trickery also.
With some exceptions, people usually judge others based on what they, themselves, are like. Randi is a faker and a conn man, so he sees everyone else in this light. I feel that anything that he is associated with is totally discredited thereby. Dan Re: CS>Bird flu question From: Himagain wrote: Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:42:55 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At 04:54 AM 24/02/05, Dan wrote: And, you >should learn something from watching the machinations of the "Amazing" >Randy; just because something is possible doesn't mean that it is being >done in any particular situation. >Dan Hi Dan & folks, The Great Randy is a good example - unfortunately not for your case. He has been thoroughly discredited by serious researchers for his tactics and lack of honesty. As Li Pi Tze said: " Always follow the gold, for where it nests is the truth" Look to who is paying the proponent. -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
