>Terry, I received this email yesterday. What do you
think? Ken Bagwell<

"Sorry, but as far as I can tell it is 'study',
singular, and it was apparently not peer reviewed….”

If we were to count the number of studies supporting
the evidence of the dangers of such things as
irradiated food, aspartame, amalgam fillings, vaccine
dangers, etc., that were not “peer reviewed” because
they were not politically or scientifically
acceptable, the number would be very, very high. “Peer
review” is greatly affected by politics, and greatly
controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. The
findings by the scientist in Switzerland were
comprehensive and objective enough that, at the very
least, I would pay attention until I was firmly
convinced not to. We don’t have any of these “peer
reviewed” studies to substantiate our confidence in
CS, but that doesn’t bother us. In fact, we understand
perfectly why those "peer reviews" have not come, and
likely will not come.

Terry Chamberlin



        

        
                
__________________________________________________________ 
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>