On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Sergey Oboguev wrote: > > From: Peter Svensson <[email protected]> > > What is the rom code comparing against and why do we not do the delay > > compared > >to that? > > > > If it is against the real time clock, would not nanosleep() or just polling > > the > >time be more portable? > > Time flow quantum exposed to applications in a portable way is not in the > nanosecond range, but is in the range of several milliseconds. > Delay has to be performed to a small fraction of this quantum.
Hi, What is the rom code able to check instruction cycle against? Real time clock imported to the simulation from the host? I.e what is it that makes the wall time of the host matter to the simulation? Peter _______________________________________________ Simh mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
