The best reference for implementation dependencies is the PDP11 architecture
handbook. It covers the topic in Appendix B, 13 pages, 52 separate items. I
don't see it on Bitsavers, unfortunately.
paul
> On Jul 9, 2020, at 7:33 PM, Johnny Billquist <b...@softjar.se> wrote:
>
> Yes, if the test says that, it must be wrong, since the 11/05 and 11/20 do
> not do the same thing here. This is documented in the MicroPDP-11 Handbook,
> for example
> (http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/handbooks/EB-24944-18_Micro_PDP-11_Handbook_1983-84.pdf,
> page 379 and forward).
>
> Johnny
>
> On 2020-07-10 00:37, Paul Moore wrote:
>> So the test doc is wrong then, it says valid for 11/05, 20 and 10 (this is
>> the MAINDEC manual dated oct 73)
>> I was running with SET CPU 11/05
>> Maybe the engineers knew to just ignore that failure, 'don’t worry they all
>> halt there, just hit run, trust me'
>> Ran the same test on 11/20 and it passes
>> TBC - none of this is my code, either the test or the emulator, running DEC
>> diagnostics on simh v4. This was just an FYI for you
>> I am stilling trying to get past the test of executing an IOT with the T bit
>> set, that’s a tough one to get right 😊. SO I have not reached this test yet
_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
