> I'm not sure it's in the released version, but while > I check, would that be useful to you?
It could be ... it would certainly be interesting to see if it makes an impact on render time. > Prerendering your html as json properties as you proposed > would probably give you good payback in speed too. If I can get comfortable with some baseline performance, I'll look into tweaking various options and share the results ... guess I was hoping for some known benchmarks or rules of thumb based on existing practice. I'd think that there has to be some relationship between size of the file (with less client-side manipulation) vs. the smaller size w/ more client side parsing (when representing the same data). Not sure which is more efficient ... probably based on a range of factors which is why I imagine it is harder to benchmark ... I imagine it depends greatly on where one wants their pain points ... on initial load or on certain events (sorting, etc). Thanks David! Matt On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:42 PM, David R. Karger <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm finding it pretty snappy on my (new) machine. > One suggestion: exhibit facets are collapsable, and we've done some work > to make facets that are collapsed not bother computing. I'm not sure > it's in the released version, but while I check, would that be useful to > you? > > Prerendering your html as json properties as you proposed would probably > give you good payback in speed too. > > Matt Pasiewicz wrote: > > Ah drat ... just realized that I'd been pointing a file to one of our dev > > sites, so it was resolving fine for me here locally, but would fail for > > everyone else ... sorry about that! Should be back in action now. > > http://www.educause.edu/E2009/EDUCAUSE2009Programtest/171882 > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:35 PM, David R. Karger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> I've just tried it from a different computer at a different institution > >> and it is still blank. > >> firefox both times. > >> > >> Matt Pasiewicz wrote: > >> > >>> Interesting that folks are having trouble with the url ... can you > check > >>> again? Everything seems to be functional, but w/ two reports of > >>> inaccessibility, I hesitate to suggest it was just a blip. And yes, I > am > >>> using drupal, but I'm not (yet) using the exhibit module/views ... the > >>> > >> json > >> > >>> is static. I only have 400+ records, so perhaps all the other > javascript > >>> > >> on > >> > >>> the page is exaggerating the problem. > >>> I'll also take a peak at the other two messages you mentioned. > >>> Let me know if you're still unable to access this page ... > >>> http://www.educause.edu/E2009/EDUCAUSE2009Programtest/171882 > >>> > >>> Many thanks! > >>> > >>> Matt > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIMILE Widgets" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/simile-widgets?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
