Hi Gary, > Consider parameters determining the "crawlibility" of the content... > Google appears to prefer longer content that > maintains a higher repetition of the keywords. On that basis rendering > data from the database into html will not produce pages of high > ratibility by Google.
I would hope that nobody is assuming sticking the contents of a large database into a web page is a good idea! If that is anyone's intention then they would be better off creating many smaller more focussed web pages each of which links to a page where the entire database is presented through exhibit or timeline or whatever. > Controlling the presentation through Exhibit makes > the Google entry look better but the page should offer extensive and > focused content to improve the rating. > Remember that Google will not see *any* of the better looking, better organized content... no matter how brilliant Exhibit is. Google *just* looks at the HTML, it doesn't care (much) about your clever CSS and it certainly doesn't run any of your Javascript. Try turning off CSS, images and Javascript in your browser and *that* is what Google sees. > The discussion is interesting and timely. > I agree. Regards, David Legg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIMILE Widgets" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/simile-widgets?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
