At 10:15 AM -0700 9/16/03, Tom Wiebe Lists wrote: >On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 07:53 AM, Michael Croft wrote:
>Any way we can block mail authenticated by this latest BS from >verisign? I've gotten more spam this morning than in most entire months >recently. :( > >Everyone, get all your friends too. Let icann.org know exactly what you >think about this latest slimey manoever by the company that makes >Microsoft blush: > >http://reports.internic.net/cgi/registrars/problem-report.cgi > >Grrr! My wife just asked me if this was going to kill backup MX servers, because all .com and .net domains will resolve. While this won't be a problem for us, since we're a .org, I couldn't answer one way or the other. So, if a MX points a domain that resolves, but (hopefully!) doesn't respond to SMTP queries, do MTAs correctly fall back to the next higher MX record? -- Michael Croft http://www.whiterose.org/michael SAM: It's 106 miles to the Crack of Doom. We've got a magic ring, two daggers, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses FRODO: Hit it. ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
