Well, it seemed like the opinions on Spamcop seemed split, that it has a bit of a hair trigger and its criteria just a bit loose for some. So, I thought to skip it for the time being.

Joe


On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 06:17 PM, Paul List Hess wrote:


At 7:17 AM -0500 9/27/03, Joe Sporleder wrote:
Ok, after checking through the archives, I came up with the following list:

cbl.abuseat.org
blackholes.easynet.nl
opm.blitzed.org
sbl.spamhaus.org
cn-kr.blackholes.us
singapore.blackholes.us
nigeria.blackholes.us
malaysia.blackholes.us
brazil.blackholes.us
relays.ordb.org
korea.services.net

One major list you seem to have left out is bl.spamcop.net. I assume you've seen the various comments pro/con and decided to skip it on purpose? Knock on wood but spamcop has been extremely useful and trouble free for me so far, not to mention the visceral enjoyment whenever I can find the time to submit a few spammers to their reporting service.


#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Reply via email to