Weddington, Eric wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From:
[email protected]
[mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongn
u.org] On Behalf Of Joel Sherrill
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 3:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx
Hi,
I would like to make sure simulavrxx has all
the capabilities avrtest and simulavr have.
I am more familiar with avrtest and think
these are the current deficiencies:
+ no maximum run limit
+ no magic "exit" port
+ no magic "abort" port
Are there other issues? I have almost finished
addressing those.
I think that the magic test to see if everything is covered under avrtest, is
to run the GCC Regression Test for the AVR and there are no differences between
avrtest and simulavrxx.
That makes sense. Once my "magic port" and time limit
changes are committed we will need to create another
dejagnu/boards file. I assume you can run avr-elf gcc tests
easily.
I noticed avrtest only supports two avr device names avr51
and avr6. I assume these are the cores/multilib names.
How do these map into the simulavrxx devices?
AT90S4433
AT90S8515
ATMEGA128
Do we want "synthethic" CPU models for testing which comprise
the right core and the phony avrtest magic ports?
Eric
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[email protected] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
