Hi,
I would like to make sure simulavrxx has all
the capabilities avrtest and simulavr have.
I am more familiar with avrtest and think
these are the current deficiencies:
+ no maximum run limit
+ no magic "exit" port
+ no magic "abort" port
Are there other issues? I have almost finished
addressing those.
What is the list of reasons to use simulavr
over simulavrxx?
I don't know how many I will be able to address
given the scope of what I am supposed to be
doing but it would be nice to have a roadmap
that makes simulavrxx the preferred FOSS AVR
simulator.
This roadmap (aka open projects) is also
needed by Google Summer of Code students
when hunting projects.
Thanks.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[email protected] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
