> -----Original Message----- > From: > [email protected] > [mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongn > u.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:55 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx > > avr-libc's testsuite mostly tests with AT90S8515 and ATmega128 targets > (which are present in simulavrxx), but some tests are run on a wider > list of target MCU types: AT90S2313, AT90S4414, AT90S8515, ATmega8, > ATmega16. These are not yet supported by simulavrxx. Further > unsupported targets include AT90S1200, ATmega32, ATmega103, and the > range of AT43USBxxx controllers. AT90S4414 is essentially the same as > AT90S8515, only less memory, so that should be easy. AT90S1200 is a > fairly different beast, and can probably be ignored as being long > obsolete.
Agreed: AT90S1200 is obsolete. > Likewise for ATmega103 (though that one *might* be > interesting in case full ATmega103 emulation of the ATmega128 is > desired). I don't know of anyone using a mega103 these days. In the interest of time, I'd rather drop that as obsolete. > AT43USBxxx are fairly specific, and certainly not really > worth the while. Agreed. Many of those devices are replaced (sorta) by the AT90USB* / ATmega???U? devices. > So ATmega8 (48/88 etc., too?), and ATmega16/32 > (almost identical except for memory sizes) would remain as really > interesting additions. Agreed. Eric _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
