> -----Original Message----- > From: > [email protected] > [mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongn > u.org] On Behalf Of Joel Sherrill > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 3:42 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx > > Hi, > > I would like to make sure simulavrxx has all > the capabilities avrtest and simulavr have. > > I am more familiar with avrtest and think > these are the current deficiencies: > > + no maximum run limit > + no magic "exit" port > + no magic "abort" port > > Are there other issues? I have almost finished > addressing those. > > What is the list of reasons to use simulavr > over simulavrxx? > > I don't know how many I will be able to address > given the scope of what I am supposed to be > doing but it would be nice to have a roadmap > that makes simulavrxx the preferred FOSS AVR > simulator. > > This roadmap (aka open projects) is also > needed by Google Summer of Code students > when hunting projects.
There's another project to be aware of (that I was just reminded of), and that is avrora: <http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/avrora/> This simulator is written in Java, which has its own drawbacks. Avrora started off as a PhD project. I have heard reports that it works well for some people, though I could not get it to work. Perhaps it would be good to add that one to the list of other projects to be feature-compatible with. Eric _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
