> -----Original Message----- > From: > [email protected] > [mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongn > u.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 3:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started > > Also, there's a knob on the Savannah web interface people who want to > join a project could press, leaving a short explanation about their > intentions as a project member. So far, there's just a single pending > request (by Colin Coombs, but I've never read that name before, nor > could I remember having seen the email from his request, it probably > predates the time when I became a project admin). There's no request > filed by Onno, none by Petr, none by anybody else. Sorry, but you > couldn't have been all that serious about your request then either.
I will back Joerg 100% on this. Look at the work that Joel Sherrill did on simulavr. He didn't complain about the type of revision control system. He just joined in in helping to move a project forward by providing patches, and doing the necessary work. Because of that, he was made a developer and admin of the project easily. There seems to be some of you more interested in using git, then in actual development. Who really cares about the type of revision control system that is being used? If git is required for this project then we would use it. As it stands, this project is so small that either CVS or SVN is sufficient for the project. One uses tools to do a job, not fit the job to the tools. It requires more effort to work together as a group, especially as volunteers. Perhaps it's too much effort for some people that they just have to move elsewhere and make a fork. _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
