Hi Eric, >> Albeit that one will likely also lack support for the two targets >> Anitha was asking for, doesn't it? > >Yes. Neither simulavr (the current incarnation) nor "avrtest" have support >for the attiny10 family, as these devices are so new. >
Ok. >My point is that if one is looking for a simulator just for testing gcc via >dejagnu, it would be better to add support to avrtest, as it is a faster >simulator for that kind of testing. > The idea is to run the testsuite (dejagnu or more) per architecture choosing some candidate device. I have used avrtest, but it supports only avr51 and avr6. In freaks I found another AVR simulator by buserror - simavr. Even that lacks tiny10 and full xmega support. That said I find the design of simulavr intuitive. Adding couple of instructions and devices should not be too difficult. But before that I would like to understand how robust the current features are. Can we rely on its results as far as ISA is concerned? I'll have to explore these. Anitha _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
