As Weddington, Eric wrote: > > The idea is to run the testsuite (dejagnu or more) per architecture > > choosing some candidate device. [...]
> There is *no* simulator, especially an open source simulator, that > is going to have atiny10 family support, or xmega support. However, as far as dejagnu is concerned, it's only the CPU core feature set that matters, doesn't it? In that case, it should be relatively simple to add attiny10 and Xmega as their only difference is a couple of instructions, and a reduced number of CPU core registers in the tiny10 case. Typically, the most difficult part for a simulator to implement is all the IO subsystem stuff. Maybe the author of avrtest would be helpful to extend it into that direction? Seems to be a more promising approach to me than trying to explore any and all opensource simulators that has ever been written for the AVR. But well, this is not the simulavr which is the subject of this mailing list here, so I think the discussion should be held elsewhere. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
