Because such an algorithm would have a large algorithmic complexity and yet be completely unintelligent. And you could produce them with the push of a sufficiently large button.
- Tom --- Shane Legg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom, > > I'm sure any computer scientist worth their salt > could > > > use a computer to write up random > ten-billion-byte-long > > algorithms that would do exactly nothing. Defining > intelligence > > that way because it's mathematically neat is just > cheating > > > Let's assume that you can make a very long program > that > is random and does not do anything. > > Why is this a problem? > > Cheers > Shane > > ----- > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: > http://www.agiri.org/email > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&; ____________________________________________________________________________________Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware protection. http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/norton/index.php ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&user_secret=8eb45b07
