Shane Legg wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGoi1MSGu64
Which got me thinking. It seems reasonable to think that killing a
human is worse than killing a mouse because a human is more
intelligent/complex/conscious/...etc...(use what ever measure you
prefer) than a mouse.
So, would killing a super intelligent machine (assuming it was possible)
be worse than killing a human?
If a machine was more intelligent/complex/conscious/...etc... than
all of humanity combined, would killing it be worse than killing all of
humanity?
What possible reason do we have for assuming that the "badness" of
killing a creature is a linear, or even a monotonic, function of the
intelligence/complexity/consciousness of that creature?
You produced two data points on the graph, and two inequalities:
B(Human) > B(Mouse)
I/C/C(Human) > I/C/C(Mouse)
How many functions could be fitted through the two data points, given
this information?
Richard Loosemore.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&user_secret=7d7fb4d8
