Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
If you have a better plan for AGI, please let me know.
I do. I did already.
You are welcome to ask questions about it at any time (see
http://susaro.com/publications).
Question: which of these papers is actually a proposal for AGI?
I did also look at http://susaro.com/archives/category/general but there is no
design here either, just a list of unfounded assertions. Perhaps you can
explain why you believe point #6 in particular to be true.
Perhaps you can explain why you described these as "unfounded
assertions" when I clearly stated in the post that the arguments to back
up this list will come later, and that this lst was intended just as a
declaration?
It really is quite frustrating when you make accusations based on the
fact that you stopped reading after a few paragraphs.
Richard Loosemore
-------------------------------------------
singularity
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/11983/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/11983/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=98631122-712fa4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com