Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
If you have a better plan for AGI, please let me know.
I do.  I did already.

You are welcome to ask questions about it at any time (see http://susaro.com/publications).

Question: which of these papers is actually a proposal for AGI?

I did also look at http://susaro.com/archives/category/general but there is no
design here either, just a list of unfounded assertions.  Perhaps you can
explain why you believe point #6 in particular to be true.

Perhaps you can explain why you described these as "unfounded assertions" when I clearly stated in the post that the arguments to back up this list will come later, and that this lst was intended just as a declaration?

It really is quite frustrating when you make accusations based on the fact that you stopped reading after a few paragraphs.



Richard Loosemore

-------------------------------------------
singularity
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/11983/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/11983/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=98631122-712fa4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to