Sorry, but this is nonsense. Whatever you define consciousness to be (for example, episodic memory), that property would exist in a computer running the same program as your brain. It has nothing to do with quantum mechanics or the properties of neurons.
--- Bertromavich Edenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For Virtual AI or General > I think if we need to make the AI's morelike us and able to function as > human beings we need to give them basicequations that make them think. > Like These: > > QUANTUM MECHANICS AND CONSCIOUSNESS > > Getting back to established scientific theory, normal waking > consciousness occurs when the nerve cell firing rate (synaptic > switching rate) is high enough to spread out the waves associated > with electrons to fill the gaps between nerve cells (synaptic > clefts) with waves of probability of similar amplitude. This is > described mathematically by the quantum mechanical mechanism of > tunneling. These waves are interconnected throughout regions of > the brain through resonances, resulting in a large, complex, > unified, quantum mechanically defined resonance matrix filling a > region in the brain. The waves are interconnected with each > other and with information storage and sensory input mechanisms > within these regions of the brain. > > > 861 > > The nerve cell firing rate (v') at which this occurs has been > modeled mathematically by Evan Harris Walker (at the U.S. Army > Ballistics Center at Aberdeen Proving Ground) and corresponds to > the threshold between waking and sleeping consciousness in people > and animals. For normal waking consciousness to exist, the > synapse transmission frequency for the brain (v') must satisfy > the condition: > > 2/3 > v' must be greater than or equal to N /T > > > where: > > N = The total number of synapses in the brain (in humans, > about 5E11) > > T = Synaptic transmission delay time (the time interval > required for the propagation of the excitation energy > from one synapse to another) > > > This theory ascribes consciousness to an association of the > events occurring at any one synapse with events occurring at > other synapses in the brain by means of a quantum mechanical > propagation of information. The sense of individual identity is > an aspect of the continuity of the wave matrix residing in the > brain [4]. > > > 862 > > QUANTUM MECHANICS AND PSYCHOKINESIS > > By merely observing a phenomenon (resonating ones brain with it) > one can affect the outcome, since the physical mechanisms in your > brain are part of the wave matrix described by quantum mechanics. > The information handling rate in resonance determines the amount > of effect, along with the elapsed time of resonance and the > probability distribution of the phenomenon you are observing > [5]. According to Evan Harris Walker, quantum mechanical state > selection can be biased by an observer if [5]: > > > W te is greater than or equal to -Log P(Qo-Qi) > Q 2 > > where: > > > P(Qo-Qi) = Probability that state Qi will occur by chance > alone > > W = Information handling rate in process in brain > Q associated with state vector selection (bits/sec) > > te = Elapsed time > > Q = Overall state vector > > Qo = Initial physical state of system > > Qi = State that manifests 'paranormal' target event > > > The effect of consciousness is incredibly small on macroscopic > systems; but it can be measurable when it occurs on quantum > mechanically defined and divergent systems, where a slight change > can amplify itself as it propagates through the system. The > effect is about 1E-17 degrees on the angle of the bounce of cubes > going down an inclined plane. Changes in the angle of bounce > result in changes in displacement of the cubes that increase > about 50% on every bounce, and the effect is measurable after > many bounces [6]. The theory successfully and quantitatively > modeled the differing amounts of displacement observed in > experiments on cubes of different weights and weight > distributions [5]. > > Walker also modeled information retrieval in 'guess the card' > experiments. Simple, classical, random chance would predict a > smooth, binomial curve for the probabilities of getting the right > answer versus the number of subjects making successful > predictions at these probabilities. Walker's model predicts that > the curve would have peaks at certain levels of probability of > getting the right answer above those predicted by chance alone. > Experimental data showed peaks at the locations modeled. > However, more people were successful at the higher probability > levels than Walker's model estimated. This is considered to be > evidence of learning enhancement [5]. > > In the world of the weird and unexplained you; are left to imagine > with; mysterious metaphors and thoughts that dont allow understanding > audiences. Bertromavich > 'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without > lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light > without darkening me.' Thomas Jefferson, letter to Isaac McPherson, 13 > August 1813 > -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------- singularity Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/11983/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/11983/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=104200892-0d3a07 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
