"M. Ranganathan" wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I don't know if this has been pointed out before (if so, please excuse
> the repetition). I discovered that the document
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-02.txt
>
> Appears to be a bit different from the bis02 pdf document available
> from
>
> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/sip/sip.html
>
> With the latter having definitions for canonical forms, for example
> whereas the former does not.
>
> Perhaps the authors may wish to consider replacing the one that is in
> the ietf draft repository if possible to avoid confusion.
The PDF version is not an official version; it's only there as an aid to
those preferring something more nicely printed. The PostScript version
in the IETF repository agrees with the PDF version.
For rather peculiar reasons having to do with a name of a directory
called 'security', the Security Considerations section was not compiled
into the ASCII version, but appeared in the LaTeX-derived PostScript and
PDF versions. I fixed the software bug and the upcoming -03 version will
be aligned again.
--
Henning Schulzrinne http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
