Hi Igor,

As I presented at the December 2000 IETF, the I-D is motivated by several
PSTN/SIP internetworking scenarios including:
Multiple diversions.
Diverting a call to an E.164 service.
Configuration issues (moving policy configuration to edges (UAs))

An ultimately called UAS can use the Diversion headers to implement a local
policy for his particular service.  For example, to answer the question:
Into which voice mailbox should a message be placed?  It's important to
understand that this is a policy decision; and as such should be
configurable at the ultimate edge of the voice network (i.e. move the smarts
to the edges).  The examples in section 9 do cover some of these issues.

Because there are some typos in the draft that need to get published, we'll
go ahead and release the -02 version.  However, we'll work on improving the
motivation scenarios for an -03 version.

thanks for your help,
Bryan

Bryan J. Byerly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Igor Slepchin wrote:

> A motivation section and examples of functionality that require this
> extension are conspicuously lacking in the current draft. Adding them may
> help me understand why this draft is needed in the first place.
>
> ---
> Igor Slepchin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bryan Byerly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 12:39 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SIP] Draft about diversion out of date
> >
> >
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > There is an updated version of the I-D available.  I'll post it to the
> > list shortly.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Bryan
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Sirs,
> > >
> > > The following I-D "draft-levy-sip-diversion-01.txt" is now
> > out of date.
> > > Could someone give us the future of that I-D:
> > > -No longer used
> > > -new version soon available,
> > > -else ?
> > >
> > > TIA for your response,
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > This list is for continuing development of the SIP protocol.
> > > The sip-implementor's list is the place to discuss implementation,
> > > and to receive advice on understanding existing sip.
> > > To subscribe to it, send mail to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "subscribe"
> > in the body.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This list is for continuing development of the SIP protocol.
> > The sip-implementor's list is the place to discuss implementation,
> > and to receive advice on understanding existing sip.
> > To subscribe to it, send mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "subscribe" in the body.
> >

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to