> -----Original Message-----
> From: T.Sunil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:28 AM
> To: Jonathan Rosenberg
> Cc: SIP implementors
> Subject: role of bis draft...
>
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Could you please clarify how much importance to be given to bis draft
> while taking implementation decisions - should we follow rfc or bis
> draft? How should we treat the changes done in bis draft when compared
> to rfc - pl. let us know.
Generally, people are (and should) follow this bis. However, it requires
some amount of attention to the list, since there are a few things in bis-02
that we have since agreed NOT to actually do (like Also). There are many
important fixes specified in bis (mandatory contact, RR in reverse
direction, spirals) that are really important to get done. Unfortunately,
since bis is work in progress, there will always be things that change.
However, since things are generally backwards compatible, these should not
cause big headaches in deployments.
>
> In fact, bis ver 02 has expired last month. What is the consequence of
> it - will there be some modifications to rfc OR another version of bis
> is going to come out.
Another bis is coming out. I am at fault for letting this slide. Expect it
this week.
-Jonathan R.
---
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist First Floor
dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
