I *think*, at this point, that bis-03 doesn't contain anything that we have
previously decided NOT to do. PGP, the old record-route text, and Also were
in that category and are now all removed.
Of course, tracking things these days is a big nightmare, but getting better
(I will have some news to report on this in the next few weeks), so I can't
guarantee that with 100% confidence.
-Jonathan R.
---
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist First Floor
dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: T.Sunil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:39 AM
> To: Jonathan Rosenberg
> Cc: SIP implementors
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Re: role of bis draft...
>
>
> HI Jonathan,
>
> Thanks for your clarification.
>
> You mentioned that there are few things in bis-02 that you
> have agreed NOT to
> actually do (like Also). Will they be removed in bis-03?
>
> Thanks,
> --Sunil
>
> Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: T.Sunil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:28 AM
> > > To: Jonathan Rosenberg
> > > Cc: SIP implementors
> > > Subject: role of bis draft...
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > >
> > > Could you please clarify how much importance to be given
> to bis draft
> > > while taking implementation decisions - should we follow
> rfc or bis
> > > draft? How should we treat the changes done in bis draft
> when compared
> > > to rfc - pl. let us know.
> >
> > Generally, people are (and should) follow this bis.
> However, it requires
> > some amount of attention to the list, since there are a few
> things in bis-02
> > that we have since agreed NOT to actually do (like Also).
> There are many
> > important fixes specified in bis (mandatory contact, RR in reverse
> > direction, spirals) that are really important to get done.
> Unfortunately,
> > since bis is work in progress, there will always be things
> that change.
> > However, since things are generally backwards compatible,
> these should not
> > cause big headaches in deployments.
> >
> > >
> > > In fact, bis ver 02 has expired last month. What is the
> consequence of
> > > it - will there be some modifications to rfc OR another
> version of bis
> > > is going to come out.
> >
> > Another bis is coming out. I am at fault for letting this
> slide. Expect it
> > this week.
> >
> > -Jonathan R.
> > ---
> > Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave.
> > Chief Scientist First Floor
> > dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
> > http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
> > http://www.dynamicsoft.com
>
> --
> Thanks,
> --Sunil
> _____________________________________
> T.SUNIL KUMAR
> Net Brahma Technologies
> Internext Networking Software
> A Microland Group Venture
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.netbrahma.com
> Tel : 91.80. 552 1451/5011/5012/5014
> Fax : 91.80. 553 7233
>
> e-card: http://www.ecardfile.com/tskr
> _____________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
