The draft is approved as an RFC, and is close to the top of
the RFC-editor's queue. So I would say, yes, this is the
extensions you follow to use SDP over ATM.
Brian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 2:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] doubt regarding SDP over ATM
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> The RFC 2327 mentions "IP4" and "IP6" as the addr-type field
> within the o= line with the provision that the list is extensible.
> The intertnet draft: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-atm-05.txt seems to talk
> of such extensions. I would like to confirm if this is the set of
> extensions
> that has to be followed to use SDP over ATM.
>
> Also this draft is due to expire in August this year. Is a
> newer version
> planned before that?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Siddharth Toshniwal
> Hughes Software Systems.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
