In addition, this approved draft also contains some generic SDP media
attributes like echo cancellation & silence suppression which can be
used in various context (SIP T.38 fax for fax passthrough case, sip and
modem calls).
Jean-Francois.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Rosen, Brian
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 5:14 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] doubt regarding SDP over ATM
>
>
> The draft is approved as an RFC, and is close to the top of
> the RFC-editor's queue. So I would say, yes, this is the
> extensions you follow to use SDP over ATM.
>
> Brian
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 2:44 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] doubt regarding SDP over ATM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The RFC 2327 mentions "IP4" and "IP6" as the addr-type field
> > within the o= line with the provision that the list is extensible.
> > The intertnet draft: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-atm-05.txt
> seems to talk
> > of such extensions. I would like to confirm if this is the set of
> > extensions
> > that has to be followed to use SDP over ATM.
> >
> > Also this draft is due to expire in August this year. Is a
> > newer version
> > planned before that?
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Siddharth Toshniwal
> > Hughes Software Systems.
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
