Bryan,
1. Component does not have a default value.
2. Component is present only in ONE of the URLs to be compared.
So, the urls do not match.
Regards,
Deepak
------------- Original Message --------------
BRYAN OGAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:BRYAN OGAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Sip-implementors] missing User and URL Comparison in bis-03
in the bis-03 draft, the following paragraph was added to section 2.1:
user or telephone-subscriber, password, host, port and any url-parameter
parameters of the URI must match. If a component is omitted, it matches
based on its default value. (For example, otherwise equivalent URLs
without a port specification and with port 5060 match.) Components not
found in both URLs being compared, for which there is no default value,
are ignored.
The first time I read this paragraph, I was left with the notion that
since user is optional, and does not have a default value, the last
sentence would be in effect, e.g.
sip:example.com
and
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
match.
This might not be considered the most obvious result, and probably
should be flagged if it is true.
--
Bryan K. Ogawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.vovida.org/
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_____________________________________________________
Chat with your friends as soon as they come online. Get Rediff Bol at
http://bol.rediff.com
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
