> -----Original Message-----
> From: BRYAN OGAWA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:38 PM
> To: Jonathan Rosenberg
> Cc: 'Deepak Mohan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] missing User and URL Comparison in
> bis-03
> 
> 
> 
> Cool.  One comment:
> 
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> 
> > OK, here is the new text that will be in -04, which is 
> hopefully clearer. I
> > added some examples too. Below is the latex source, so if 
> you don't know
> > latex, just ignore all the \whatever{} stuff:
> > 
> > \item \header{user} or \header{telephone-subscriber}, 
> \header{password},
> > \header{host}, \header{port} and any \header{url-parameter} 
> parameters
> > of the URI must match.  If one of the components in the previous
> > sentence is omitted, it matches based on its default value.  (For
> > example, otherwise equivalent URLs without a port specification and
> > with port 5060 match.) URL parameters (which excludes
> > \header{telephone-subscriber}, \header{password}, and \header{port})
> 
> here, I'd add \header{user} to the list of things which aren't URL
> parameters, if you're going to list them.

No, user is a URL parameter, and it has a default (user=ip). Thus:

sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=ip

and

sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

are equal.

-JOnathan R.

---
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist                             First Floor
dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to