Hi Arunachalam, thanks for your comments!

Arunachalam Venkatraman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> 1. This draft consistently refers to the use of Replaces header in an
> attended (3way) call scenario only. The call transfer draft
> (transfer-05) has a discussion on the usage of Replaces in an
> Unattended Consulation Hold with protection of transfer target in
> 7.5.1. The previous versions of  the transfer drafts had a section
> (4.6 in transfer-04) deferring the discussion of Attended Call
> Transfer but the current one does not have any reference to this.
> Since Replaces is envisaged as a good candidate to do protected call
> transfer where the transferee does not have the capability of
> accepting multiple call appearances, the Replaces draft should not
> restrict itself to attended transfers and possibly even discuss and
> show an example of its use for Unattended transfers.

  I see it all as basically the same problem, but I'll try and change
the wording to be more general.

> 2. Section 4 of Replaces draft-01 discusses about ignoring the
> Replaces header if there is a match on more than one leg. How is it
> possible to have multiple legs on a single call (identified by its
> call-Id) to have identical from/to tags? Are not the tags which help
> distinguish one leg of a call from another?

  You're correct that this case should never occur unless you have a
non-compliant UA.  The behavior suggestion is there for protection.

> 3. Section 5 - The call flow should show the call-Id in each message
> exchange. It is not evident that the 3rd INVITE has a new Call-Id. It
> is also not clear why the Replaces Header in the INVITE to the
> Transfer Target is referring to Call-Id 1 when it has no knowledge of
> that call. It may better help understanding the use of this header if
> there are full message examples, in addition to the call-flows.

  I'm sorry, I messed up the example.  I'll try and fix this all up ASAP
and release a new version.

-- 
Billy Biggs                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.billybiggs.com/      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to