I believe the idea is to fold in the requirements of draft-donovan-publish-requirements-00.txt. For example, this will mean a new method rather than overloading REGISTER.
"Rahman, Mohib" wrote: > > I see the draft, draft-lennox-sip-reg-payload-01 has already expired on > April 2001. Just wondering is there any plan to put a newer version of this > draft? > > Also Content-Disposition header used in this draft is different from the > rfc2543bis-xx that are released after this reg-payload draft. So is there > any plan to update this draft with this Content-Disposition like changes > based on rfc2543bis-xx? > > Regards, > Mohib Rahman > Trillium Digital Systems, an Intel Company > Los Angeles, CA -- Henning Schulzrinne http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
