Well, it's more than two months since publishing of draft-donovan-publish-requirements-00.txt. And just to recap, this draft basically mention if SIP or non-SIP is a good candidate to upload service data like CPL, SIP-CGI, Presence documents.... Also it mentions what would be requirement of the proposed draft.
But I cannot recall any further discussion if SIP is a good candidate then what would be the new method to upload he data from client to server. Just wondering is there any plan to come up with a new draft based on the requirement of draft-donovan-publish-requirements-00.txt. As it is decided not to overload REGISTER method for this uploading purpose, are we planning to come up with new method or to select method from the existing ones? regards, mohib -----Original Message----- From: Henning G. Schulzrinne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:37 PM To: Rahman, Mohib Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: draft-lennox-sip-reg-payload-01 I believe the idea is to fold in the requirements of draft-donovan-publish-requirements-00.txt. For example, this will mean a new method rather than overloading REGISTER. "Rahman, Mohib" wrote: > > I see the draft, draft-lennox-sip-reg-payload-01 has already expired on > April 2001. Just wondering is there any plan to put a newer version of this > draft? > > Also Content-Disposition header used in this draft is different from the > rfc2543bis-xx that are released after this reg-payload draft. So is there > any plan to update this draft with this Content-Disposition like changes > based on rfc2543bis-xx? > > Regards, > Mohib Rahman > Trillium Digital Systems, an Intel Company > Los Angeles, CA -- Henning Schulzrinne http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
