Kevin Packard wrote:
>>>What is the current state of draft-rosenberg-sip-entfw-02.txt? How
>>>likely is it that persistent TCP/TLS connections will be rolled into
>>>2543-bis?
>>>
>>
>>They are already there, and have been for some time (since -03, I
>>think).
>>
>>-Jonathan R.
>>
>
> Just to clarify: by persistent TCP/TLS connections, I meant the UA
> establishes a connection with a Proxy/Registrar, and the REGISTER
> transaction messages are sent/received on that connection. The UA
> leaves that connection open, and expects to receive INVITE and other
> requests on that same open connection.
>
> This is how I read draft-ietf-sip-nat-01. Are you saying that this is
> already in 2543-bis? I think I'm missing something.
The usage of persistent connections, in the sense that when I want to
send to 1.2.3.4:5566, and a connection is open to it, use it; thats in
bis. Associating a connection with a registration is not in bis. For
that, you will need the translate header from draft-ietf-sip-nat.
-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Avenue
Chief Scientist First Floor
dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PH: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
