Prasanna wrote:
> Dr. Jonathan,
> I accept that this idea is not a standardized practice and there
> is not
> currect consensus on the handling of the bodies in non-INVITE messages
> and
> in fact the non-sdp messages. But if we have to communicate some kind
> of
> call charging from a switch, there is no way that we can do it as of
> now.
Generally speaking, it is usually not necesary to call the charging
information an sip, and there are good reasons for it.
> Even in a case of a pre-paid card service if the user needs to
> be
> communicated with the money left in his card after the call is over, it
> is
> quite impossible to communicate that to the terminal.
Normally its done with voice prompts.
If you have a PC terminal, HTML is not the wrong thing, but its not
likely that these terminals will render the HTML. I would instead advise
you to look at:
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosenberg-sipping-markup-00.txt
> If the usage of ours have a lot of problems, I would be
> interested in
> knowing what kind of dangers this leads to. Also can some explanation
> be
> given what should a terminal do in a case it receives a html/text body
> in a
> non-2xx final response for an INVITE indicating some kind of failure.
It should render it.
-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Avenue
Chief Scientist First Floor
dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PH: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
